TY - GEN
T1 - Prediction of wipp data using a relaxed-wake potential flow method
AU - Cole, Julia A.
AU - Barcelos, Devin
AU - Krebs, Travis
AU - Melville, Michael
AU - Bramesfeld, Götz
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to express their gratitude towards the organizers of the Workshop for Integrated Propulsion Prediction for their time and effort on this project. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support through access to the resources of Compute Canada and funding from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this study, experimental results of the Workshop for Integrated Propulsion Prediction are compared with the authors’ initial and revised predictions using a relaxed-wake potential flow method. Digitized anonymous Navier-Stokes CFD predictions submitted by other groups are also provided for comparison. The potential flow method consists of higher-order distributed vorticity elements that are used to model both the propeller and wing surfaces and wakes. Viscous effects are taken into account through profile drag estimation using tabulated airfoil data and an empirical nacelle model. Inherent shortcomings of the method for this application lie primarily in the implicit assumption of a 2-D lift-curve slope of 2π per radian and an overly simplistic stall model for the wing. Regardless, predictions of wing lift and drag of the propeller-wing system found using this method are similar in accuracy to the CFD submissions in the pre-stall region. Four suggestions are made for ways to improve predictions: more extensive propeller performance data for validation, quantification of wind-tunnel freestream turbulence levels and model surface roughness, careful attention to detail with respect to the test model geometry, and more information on uncertainty with respect to the book-keeping process for separating drag from thrust in force measurements.
AB - In this study, experimental results of the Workshop for Integrated Propulsion Prediction are compared with the authors’ initial and revised predictions using a relaxed-wake potential flow method. Digitized anonymous Navier-Stokes CFD predictions submitted by other groups are also provided for comparison. The potential flow method consists of higher-order distributed vorticity elements that are used to model both the propeller and wing surfaces and wakes. Viscous effects are taken into account through profile drag estimation using tabulated airfoil data and an empirical nacelle model. Inherent shortcomings of the method for this application lie primarily in the implicit assumption of a 2-D lift-curve slope of 2π per radian and an overly simplistic stall model for the wing. Regardless, predictions of wing lift and drag of the propeller-wing system found using this method are similar in accuracy to the CFD submissions in the pre-stall region. Four suggestions are made for ways to improve predictions: more extensive propeller performance data for validation, quantification of wind-tunnel freestream turbulence levels and model surface roughness, careful attention to detail with respect to the test model geometry, and more information on uncertainty with respect to the book-keeping process for separating drag from thrust in force measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092445862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092445862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2020-2681
DO - 10.2514/6.2020-2681
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85092445862
SN - 9781624105982
T3 - AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
SP - 1
EP - 13
BT - AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
Y2 - 15 June 2020 through 19 June 2020
ER -