TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive large-eddy-simulation wall modeling via physics-informed neural networks
AU - Yang, X. I.A.
AU - Zafar, S.
AU - Wang, J. X.
AU - Xiao, H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Physical Society.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - While data-based approaches were found to be useful for subgrid scale (SGS) modeling in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, there have not been many attempts at using machine learning techniques for wall modeling in large-eddy simulations (LESs). Large-eddy simulation differs from RANS simulation in many aspects. For one thing, LES is scale resolving. For another, LES is in and of itself a high-fidelity tool. Because data sets of higher fidelity are in general not frequently accessible or available, this poses additional challenges to data-based modeling in LES. Further, SGS modeling usually needs flow information at only large scales, in contrast with wall modeling, which needs to account for both near-wall small scales and large scales above the wall. In this work we discuss how the above-noted challenges may be addressed when taking a data-based approach for wall modeling. We also show the necessity of incorporating physical insights in model inputs, i.e., using inputs that are inspired by the vertically integrated thin-boundary-layer equations and the eddy population density scalings. We show that the inclusion of the above physics-based considerations would enhance extrapolation capabilities of a neural network to flow conditions that are not within the train data. Being cheap to evaluate and using only channel flow data at Reτ=1000, the trained networks are found to capture the law of the wall at arbitrary Reynolds numbers and outperform the conventional equilibrium model in a nonequilibrium flow.
AB - While data-based approaches were found to be useful for subgrid scale (SGS) modeling in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, there have not been many attempts at using machine learning techniques for wall modeling in large-eddy simulations (LESs). Large-eddy simulation differs from RANS simulation in many aspects. For one thing, LES is scale resolving. For another, LES is in and of itself a high-fidelity tool. Because data sets of higher fidelity are in general not frequently accessible or available, this poses additional challenges to data-based modeling in LES. Further, SGS modeling usually needs flow information at only large scales, in contrast with wall modeling, which needs to account for both near-wall small scales and large scales above the wall. In this work we discuss how the above-noted challenges may be addressed when taking a data-based approach for wall modeling. We also show the necessity of incorporating physical insights in model inputs, i.e., using inputs that are inspired by the vertically integrated thin-boundary-layer equations and the eddy population density scalings. We show that the inclusion of the above physics-based considerations would enhance extrapolation capabilities of a neural network to flow conditions that are not within the train data. Being cheap to evaluate and using only channel flow data at Reτ=1000, the trained networks are found to capture the law of the wall at arbitrary Reynolds numbers and outperform the conventional equilibrium model in a nonequilibrium flow.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063998967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063998967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.034602
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.034602
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063998967
SN - 2469-990X
VL - 4
JO - Physical Review Fluids
JF - Physical Review Fluids
IS - 3
M1 - 034602
ER -