TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of attrition in a randomized controlled trial of an electronic nicotine delivery system among people interested in cigarette smoking reduction
AU - Randomized Control Trial Methods Workgroup of the Center for the Study of Tobacco Products: Member List
AU - Cobb, Caroline O.
AU - Budd, Serenity
AU - Maldonado, Gabrielle
AU - Imran, Rabia
AU - Foulds, Jonathan
AU - Yingst, Jessica
AU - Yen, Miao Shan
AU - Kang, Le
AU - Sun, Shumei
AU - Hall, Phoebe Brosnan
AU - Chowdhury, Nadia
AU - Cohen, Joanna E.
AU - Eissenberg, Thomas
AU - Brosnan, Phoebe
AU - Graham, Jacob T.
AU - Lopez, Alexa A.
AU - Lipato, Thokozeni
AU - Hammett, Erin
AU - Hrabovsky, Sharilee
AU - Hummer, Breianna L.
AU - Lester, Courtney
AU - Richie, John P.
AU - Veldheer, Susan
AU - Yingst, Jessica M.
AU - Sciamanna, Christopher
AU - Allen, Sophia I.
AU - Bullen, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Background: Mitigating attrition is a key component to reduce selection bias in longitudinal randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Few studies of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) allow for the examination of long-term retention. This analysis explores the relationship between attrition, baseline measures, and condition assigned for a RCT involving ENDS differing in nicotine delivery over a 24-week intervention period. Methods: Participants (N = 520) who smoked ≥10 cigarettes per day [CPD] for ≥1 year and reported interest in reducing but not quitting were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions: an ENDS containing 0, 8, or 36 mg/ml liquid nicotine (administered double-blind) or a cigarette-shaped plastic tube. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to examine attrition over time and predictors of attrition including baseline characteristics and condition. A stepwise approach was used to determine the final model; alpha was set at 0.05. Results: Attrition did not differ significantly by condition (223/520), and most (69%) were lost-to-follow-up. Only age, education level, and household income were significantly predictive of attrition. For every additional year of age, attrition risk fell by 3%. Holding a bachelor's degree or higher was associated with reduced attrition risk. Those with the lowest income (<$10 K) were more likely to be withdrawn compared to those earning $10 K–39 K, and those with the highest income ($100 K+) were more likely to be withdrawn compared with the latter bracket and those earning $70-99 K. Conclusion: ENDS nicotine content did not drive differential attrition in this trial, and targeted retention efforts are needed for specific subgroups.
AB - Background: Mitigating attrition is a key component to reduce selection bias in longitudinal randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Few studies of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) allow for the examination of long-term retention. This analysis explores the relationship between attrition, baseline measures, and condition assigned for a RCT involving ENDS differing in nicotine delivery over a 24-week intervention period. Methods: Participants (N = 520) who smoked ≥10 cigarettes per day [CPD] for ≥1 year and reported interest in reducing but not quitting were randomized to 1 of 4 conditions: an ENDS containing 0, 8, or 36 mg/ml liquid nicotine (administered double-blind) or a cigarette-shaped plastic tube. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to examine attrition over time and predictors of attrition including baseline characteristics and condition. A stepwise approach was used to determine the final model; alpha was set at 0.05. Results: Attrition did not differ significantly by condition (223/520), and most (69%) were lost-to-follow-up. Only age, education level, and household income were significantly predictive of attrition. For every additional year of age, attrition risk fell by 3%. Holding a bachelor's degree or higher was associated with reduced attrition risk. Those with the lowest income (<$10 K) were more likely to be withdrawn compared to those earning $10 K–39 K, and those with the highest income ($100 K+) were more likely to be withdrawn compared with the latter bracket and those earning $70-99 K. Conclusion: ENDS nicotine content did not drive differential attrition in this trial, and targeted retention efforts are needed for specific subgroups.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202456052
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202456052#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107662
DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107662
M3 - Article
C2 - 39142511
AN - SCOPUS:85202456052
SN - 1551-7144
VL - 145
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials
M1 - 107662
ER -