TY - GEN
T1 - Preference construction, sequential decision making, and trade space exploration
AU - Miller, Simon W.
AU - Simpson, Timothy W.
AU - Yukish, Michael A.
AU - Bennett, Lorri A.
AU - Lego, Sara E.
AU - Stump, Gary M.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.
AB - This paper develops and explores the interface between two related concepts in design decision making. First, design decision making is a process of simultaneously constructing one's preferences while satisfying them. Second, design using computational models (e.g., simulation-based design and model-based design) is a sequential process that starts with low fidelity models for initial trades and progresses through models of increasing detail. Thus, decision making during design should be treated as a sequential decision process rather than as a single decision problem. This premise is supported by research from the domains of behavioral economics, psychology, judgment and decision making, neuroeconomics, marketing, and engineering design as reviewed herein. The premise is also substantiated by our own experience in conducting trade studies for numerous customers across engineering domains. The paper surveys the pertinent literature, presents supporting case studies and identifies use cases from our experiences, synthesizes a preliminary model of the sequential process, presents ongoing research in this area, and provides suggestions for future efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896985552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896985552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DETC2013-13098
DO - 10.1115/DETC2013-13098
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84896985552
SN - 9780791855881
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
BT - 39th Design Automation Conference
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers
T2 - ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2013
Y2 - 4 August 2013 through 7 August 2013
ER -