TY - JOUR
T1 - Preferences, Proximity, and Controlled Choice
T2 - Examining Families’ School Choices and Enrollment Decisions in Louisville, Kentucky
AU - Frankenberg, Erica
N1 - Funding Information:
I gratefully acknowledge Jefferson County (Kentucky) Public Schools for providing data that I analyze here and support from WT Grant Foundation Grant No. 184309. Stephen Kotok provided helpful research assistance.
PY - 2018/8/8
Y1 - 2018/8/8
N2 - This study provides evidence studying one diverse, countywide district’s integration efforts utilizing school choice and parental preferences. The findings illustrate substantial differences about the way in which the district’s student assignment policy affects students. In particular, this choice-based integration policy with a weak geographic preference still advantages those who choose their nearest schools as well as white students and those living in more advantaged areas. Examining differences in families’ school preferences, whether students are assigned to their preferred school, and whether and where students enroll in schools illustrates how an integration-focused assignment policy can still result in segregation and inequality. Yet, by illustrating the many influences on family preferences beyond proximity, it also suggests the opportunity for using assignment policy to overcome persistent neighborhood segregation.
AB - This study provides evidence studying one diverse, countywide district’s integration efforts utilizing school choice and parental preferences. The findings illustrate substantial differences about the way in which the district’s student assignment policy affects students. In particular, this choice-based integration policy with a weak geographic preference still advantages those who choose their nearest schools as well as white students and those living in more advantaged areas. Examining differences in families’ school preferences, whether students are assigned to their preferred school, and whether and where students enroll in schools illustrates how an integration-focused assignment policy can still result in segregation and inequality. Yet, by illustrating the many influences on family preferences beyond proximity, it also suggests the opportunity for using assignment policy to overcome persistent neighborhood segregation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055124624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055124624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0161956X.2018.1488392
DO - 10.1080/0161956X.2018.1488392
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055124624
SN - 0161-956X
VL - 93
SP - 378
EP - 394
JO - Peabody Journal of Education
JF - Peabody Journal of Education
IS - 4
ER -