TY - JOUR
T1 - Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior
T2 - Methods and findings
AU - Cohen-Bendahan, Celina C.C.
AU - Van De Beek, Cornelieke
AU - Berenbaum, Sheri A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Carolina de Weerth for inviting us to write this paper and for her help during its preparation, Catherine Bakey for her help with the literature on dermatoglyphic asymmetry, and the editors and anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also acknowledge grants that supported the preparation of this chapter and our own research reported here: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) grants 575-25-011 (C.C.C.C.-B) and 575-25-010 (C.v.d.B.), and National Institutes of Health grant HD19644 (S.A.B.).
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - There is now good evidence that human sex-typed behavior is influenced by sex hormones that are present during prenatal development, confirming studies in other mammalian species. Most of the evidence comes from clinical populations, in which prenatal hormone exposure is atypical for a person's sex, but there is increasing evidence from the normal population for the importance of prenatal hormones. In this paper, we briefly review the evidence, focusing attention on the methods used to study behavioral effects of prenatal hormones. We discuss the promises and pitfalls of various types of studies, including those using clinical populations (concentrating on those most commonly studied, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen insensitivity syndrome, ablatio penis, and cloacal exstrophy), direct measures of hormones in the general population (assayed through umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, and maternal serum during pregnancy), and indirect measures of hormones in the general population (inferred from intrauterine position and biomarkers such as otoacoustic emissions, finger length ratios, and dermatoglyphic asymmetries). We conclude with suggestions for interpreting and conducting studies of the behavioral effects of prenatal hormones.
AB - There is now good evidence that human sex-typed behavior is influenced by sex hormones that are present during prenatal development, confirming studies in other mammalian species. Most of the evidence comes from clinical populations, in which prenatal hormone exposure is atypical for a person's sex, but there is increasing evidence from the normal population for the importance of prenatal hormones. In this paper, we briefly review the evidence, focusing attention on the methods used to study behavioral effects of prenatal hormones. We discuss the promises and pitfalls of various types of studies, including those using clinical populations (concentrating on those most commonly studied, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen insensitivity syndrome, ablatio penis, and cloacal exstrophy), direct measures of hormones in the general population (assayed through umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, and maternal serum during pregnancy), and indirect measures of hormones in the general population (inferred from intrauterine position and biomarkers such as otoacoustic emissions, finger length ratios, and dermatoglyphic asymmetries). We conclude with suggestions for interpreting and conducting studies of the behavioral effects of prenatal hormones.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244420740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16244420740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 15811504
AN - SCOPUS:16244420740
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 29
SP - 353
EP - 384
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
IS - 2
ER -