TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparative induction and characterization of L-antithrombin
T2 - A structural homologue of latent plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
AU - Wardell, Mark R.
AU - Chang, Wun Shaing W.
AU - Bruce, David
AU - Skinner, Richard
AU - Lesk, Arthur M.
AU - Carrell, Robin W.
PY - 1997/10/21
Y1 - 1997/10/21
N2 - The inhibitory mechanism of the serpin family of serine protease inhibitors is characterized by a remarkable degree of conformational flexibility. Various conformational states have been elucidated by X-ray crystallography and indicate that the inhibitory loop, the central A-β- sheet, and the outside edge of the C-β-sheet are particularly mobile. However, no crystal structure of a serpin-enzyme complex is yet available, and the likely nature of the protease-complexed serpin remains for biochemical and biophysical researchers to examine. Here, we show that the biochemical induction of the latent state of antithrombin is slow relative to polymer formation, and infer that this may reflect structural features that are important for the regulation of the initial docking and subsequent locking of serpins with cognate proteases. L-Antithrombin was induced by incubation of native antithrombin at 60 °C for 10 h in the presence of citrate to prevent polymerization. L-Antithrombin was more stable to denaturation by both heat and urea than native antithrombin. Whereas native antithrombin formed binary complexes with synthetic peptide homologues of the inhibitory loop, biochemically induced L-antithrombin did not, indicating that the inhibitory loop of L-antithrombin is probably fully inserted into the A-β-sheet as in the crystal structure. This was confirmed by limited proteolysis studies which demonstrated that the inhibitory loop of L- antithrombin could not he cleaved by five proteases which do cleave the loop of native antithrombin. The limited proteolysis studies also indicated that the 'gate' region (residues 236-248) of the biochemically induced L- antithrombin was in a conformation substantially different from that of the native antithrombin. This again is similar to L-antithrombin in the crystal structure in which the gate has 'opened' away from the body of the molecule by a rotation of 24°to facilitate the relocation of strand 1C from its ordered position in the C-β-sheet to a disordered surface loop. At 60 °C in the absence of citrate, antithrombin (and other serpins) rapidly polymerizes. In the presence of citrate, the formation of L-antithrombin is slow and increases with time, indicating that the inhibition of polymer formation by citrate allows the time necessary for the much slower formation of the L form. We therefore suggest that L-antithrombin formation is a two-step process: an initial rapid conformational change, probably including partial incorporation of the reactive loop into the A-sheet (as in the active molecule in the crystal structure) and displacement of sic from the C-β- sheet which supports polymer formation, and a much slower transition to complete loop insertion within the A-β-sheet. It is likely that both the first rapid transitional step and the structural features that impose resistance to the second more extensive conformational change reflect the optimization of the unique inhibitory function in the serpins.
AB - The inhibitory mechanism of the serpin family of serine protease inhibitors is characterized by a remarkable degree of conformational flexibility. Various conformational states have been elucidated by X-ray crystallography and indicate that the inhibitory loop, the central A-β- sheet, and the outside edge of the C-β-sheet are particularly mobile. However, no crystal structure of a serpin-enzyme complex is yet available, and the likely nature of the protease-complexed serpin remains for biochemical and biophysical researchers to examine. Here, we show that the biochemical induction of the latent state of antithrombin is slow relative to polymer formation, and infer that this may reflect structural features that are important for the regulation of the initial docking and subsequent locking of serpins with cognate proteases. L-Antithrombin was induced by incubation of native antithrombin at 60 °C for 10 h in the presence of citrate to prevent polymerization. L-Antithrombin was more stable to denaturation by both heat and urea than native antithrombin. Whereas native antithrombin formed binary complexes with synthetic peptide homologues of the inhibitory loop, biochemically induced L-antithrombin did not, indicating that the inhibitory loop of L-antithrombin is probably fully inserted into the A-β-sheet as in the crystal structure. This was confirmed by limited proteolysis studies which demonstrated that the inhibitory loop of L- antithrombin could not he cleaved by five proteases which do cleave the loop of native antithrombin. The limited proteolysis studies also indicated that the 'gate' region (residues 236-248) of the biochemically induced L- antithrombin was in a conformation substantially different from that of the native antithrombin. This again is similar to L-antithrombin in the crystal structure in which the gate has 'opened' away from the body of the molecule by a rotation of 24°to facilitate the relocation of strand 1C from its ordered position in the C-β-sheet to a disordered surface loop. At 60 °C in the absence of citrate, antithrombin (and other serpins) rapidly polymerizes. In the presence of citrate, the formation of L-antithrombin is slow and increases with time, indicating that the inhibition of polymer formation by citrate allows the time necessary for the much slower formation of the L form. We therefore suggest that L-antithrombin formation is a two-step process: an initial rapid conformational change, probably including partial incorporation of the reactive loop into the A-sheet (as in the active molecule in the crystal structure) and displacement of sic from the C-β- sheet which supports polymer formation, and a much slower transition to complete loop insertion within the A-β-sheet. It is likely that both the first rapid transitional step and the structural features that impose resistance to the second more extensive conformational change reflect the optimization of the unique inhibitory function in the serpins.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030700799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030700799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/bi970664u
DO - 10.1021/bi970664u
M3 - Article
C2 - 9335576
AN - SCOPUS:0030700799
SN - 0006-2960
VL - 36
SP - 13133
EP - 13142
JO - Biochemistry
JF - Biochemistry
IS - 42
ER -