Pro-Con Debate: Are Patients with Coronary Stents Suitable for Free-Standing Ambulatory Surgery Centers?

Eric B. Rosero, Niraja Rajan, Girish P. Joshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


With increasing implantation of coronary artery stents over the past 2 decades, it is inevitable that anesthesiologists practicing in the outpatient setting will need to determine whether these patients are suitable for procedures at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Appropriate selection of patients with coronary artery stents for a procedure in an ASC requires consideration of factors that affect the balance between the risk of stent thrombosis due to interruption of antiplatelet therapy and the thrombogenic effects of surgery, and the risk of perioperative bleeding complications that may occur if antiplatelet therapy is continued. Thus, periprocedure care of these patients presents unique challenges, particularly for extensive surgical procedures that are increasingly scheduled for free-standing ASCs, where consultation and ancillary services, as well as access to percutaneous cardiac interventions, may not be readily available. Therefore, the suitability of the ambulatory setting for this patient population remains highly controversial. In this Pro-Con commentary, we discuss the arguments for and against scheduling patients with coronary artery stents in free-standing ASCs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-226
Number of pages9
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Pro-Con Debate: Are Patients with Coronary Stents Suitable for Free-Standing Ambulatory Surgery Centers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this