TY - JOUR
T1 - PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES FOR CREDIT SCREENING AND BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION
AU - Pendharkar, Parag C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2011/10/1
Y1 - 2011/10/1
N2 - Three probabilistic neural network approaches are used for credit screening and bankruptcy prediction: a logistic regression neural network (LRNN), a probabilistic neural network (PNN) and a semi-supervised expectation maximization-based neural network. Using real-world bankruptcy prediction and credit screening datasets, we compare the three probabilistic approaches using various performance criteria of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, decile lift and area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The results of our experiments indicate that the PNN outperforms the other two techniques for decile lift and specificity performance metric. Using the area under ROC curve, we find that for bankruptcy prediction data the PNN outperforms the other two approaches when false positive rates (FPRs) are less than 40 %. LRNN outperforms the other two techniques for FPRs higher than 40 % for bankruptcy data. We observe that the LRNN results are very sensitive to the ratio of examples belonging to two classes in training data and there is a tendency to overfit training data.
AB - Three probabilistic neural network approaches are used for credit screening and bankruptcy prediction: a logistic regression neural network (LRNN), a probabilistic neural network (PNN) and a semi-supervised expectation maximization-based neural network. Using real-world bankruptcy prediction and credit screening datasets, we compare the three probabilistic approaches using various performance criteria of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, decile lift and area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The results of our experiments indicate that the PNN outperforms the other two techniques for decile lift and specificity performance metric. Using the area under ROC curve, we find that for bankruptcy prediction data the PNN outperforms the other two approaches when false positive rates (FPRs) are less than 40 %. LRNN outperforms the other two techniques for FPRs higher than 40 % for bankruptcy data. We observe that the LRNN results are very sensitive to the ratio of examples belonging to two classes in training data and there is a tendency to overfit training data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890572282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890572282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/isaf.331
DO - 10.1002/isaf.331
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84890572282
SN - 1550-1949
VL - 18
SP - 177
EP - 193
JO - Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
JF - Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
IS - 4
ER -