TY - JOUR
T1 - Projecting SEER cancer survival rates to the US
T2 - An ecological regression approach
AU - Mariotto, Angela
AU - Capocaccia, Riccardo
AU - Verdecchia, Arduino
AU - Micheli, Andrea
AU - Feuer, Eric J.
AU - Pickle, Linda
AU - Clegg, Limin X.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) contract no. 263-MQ-730220 and by funds from the Italian Ministry of Health no. RF 97.1 ICSO030.1. This work was initiated while the first author was at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Objectives: Cancer survival information is available only in areas covered by cancer registration. The objective of this study is to project cancer survival for the entire US as well as states from survival data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Methods: Five-year breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer relative survival rates from SEER are regressed on socioeconomic, demographic, and health variables at the county level. These models are first validated by comparing the observed rates with projected rates for counties not used in the estimation process. Results: Education was the best indicator of longer cancer survival. Other important predictors of the geographical variability of survival varied by cancer site. Better survival was predicted for breast and prostate than for colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Data from cancer registries can be used in ecological models to provide national and state estimates of patients' survival rates. These estimates are useful in targeting areas in which to promote earlier diagnosis or improved access to care, and may also aid in monitoring the quality of survival data collected by individual cancer registries.
AB - Objectives: Cancer survival information is available only in areas covered by cancer registration. The objective of this study is to project cancer survival for the entire US as well as states from survival data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Methods: Five-year breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer relative survival rates from SEER are regressed on socioeconomic, demographic, and health variables at the county level. These models are first validated by comparing the observed rates with projected rates for counties not used in the estimation process. Results: Education was the best indicator of longer cancer survival. Other important predictors of the geographical variability of survival varied by cancer site. Better survival was predicted for breast and prostate than for colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Data from cancer registries can be used in ecological models to provide national and state estimates of patients' survival rates. These estimates are useful in targeting areas in which to promote earlier diagnosis or improved access to care, and may also aid in monitoring the quality of survival data collected by individual cancer registries.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036121488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036121488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1014380323037
DO - 10.1023/A:1014380323037
M3 - Article
C2 - 11936816
AN - SCOPUS:0036121488
SN - 0957-5243
VL - 13
SP - 101
EP - 111
JO - Cancer Causes and Control
JF - Cancer Causes and Control
IS - 2
ER -