Psychoanalysis and ethnology revisited: Foucault’s historicization of history

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


This article re-examines the closing sections of Michel Foucault’s The Order of Things in order to address the longstanding question of whether he is best understood as a philosopher or a historian. My central argument is that this question misses the crucial point of Foucault’s work, which is to historicize the notion of history (as it is traditionally understood, represented by History with a capital H), which Foucault takes to be central to the historical a priori of modernity. An examination of his historicization of History thus reveals that Foucault is neither simply a philosopher—because he conceives of philosophy in modernity as a historical enterprise— nor a historian—because his own historical approach is designed to transform the modern historical a priori from within. This analysis also sheds new light of Foucault’s relationship to psychoanalysis and his conception of critique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-46
Number of pages16
JournalSouthern Journal of Philosophy
StatePublished - Sep 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Psychoanalysis and ethnology revisited: Foucault’s historicization of history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this