TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychotherapy integration
T2 - An idea whose time has come
AU - Castonguay, Louis G.
AU - Goldfried, Marvin R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The significance and magnitude of this attitude change is easily revealed by the discourse, over the last decades, that some leading figures of particular schools have held con- This article was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH40196) awarded to the second author. The first author also served as a Co-investigator on this grant.
Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Growing numbers of clinicians and researchers from the major therapeutic orientations have begun to demonstrate an open attitude toward potential contributions of other approaches. Efforts at rapprochement and integration sharply contrast with the acrimonious debates that prevailed in the field a few decades ago. These efforts represent much needed attempts to better understand psychotherapy and to improve its effectiveness. In this article, the factors that have contributed to the emergence and development of psychotherapy integration are described, including the inadequacies of predominant models, limited effectiveness of existing treatments, and external pressures for the accountability of psychotherapy. Also reviewed are core issues within the integration movement itself, such as the search for theoretical integration, elaboration of eclectic therapies, identification of conceptual convergence and common factors, development of integrative approaches for particular clinical problems, and improvement in major orientations as a result of transtheoretical dialogue. Finally, several unresolved issues and unanswered questions facing psychotherapy integration are described, as they suggest future directions for the development of this movement.
AB - Growing numbers of clinicians and researchers from the major therapeutic orientations have begun to demonstrate an open attitude toward potential contributions of other approaches. Efforts at rapprochement and integration sharply contrast with the acrimonious debates that prevailed in the field a few decades ago. These efforts represent much needed attempts to better understand psychotherapy and to improve its effectiveness. In this article, the factors that have contributed to the emergence and development of psychotherapy integration are described, including the inadequacies of predominant models, limited effectiveness of existing treatments, and external pressures for the accountability of psychotherapy. Also reviewed are core issues within the integration movement itself, such as the search for theoretical integration, elaboration of eclectic therapies, identification of conceptual convergence and common factors, development of integrative approaches for particular clinical problems, and improvement in major orientations as a result of transtheoretical dialogue. Finally, several unresolved issues and unanswered questions facing psychotherapy integration are described, as they suggest future directions for the development of this movement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000348279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000348279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80068-X
DO - 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80068-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000348279
SN - 0962-1849
VL - 3
SP - 159
EP - 172
JO - Applied and Preventive Psychology
JF - Applied and Preventive Psychology
IS - 3
ER -