Abstract
In order to clarify the source of the discrepancy between our previous transition temperature determination [Phys. Lett. B 643, 46 (2006)] and that of the Bielefeld-Brookhaven-Columbia-Riken collaboration we improved our calculations by taking even smaller lattice spacings (Nt = 12 and Nt = 16 at one point) and by using physical quark masses also for the T = 0 quantities. In addition to the kaon decay constant used for scale setting we determine four quantities (masses of the Ω baryon, k*(892) and φ{symbol}(1020) mesons and the pion decay constant) which are found to agree with experiment. This implies that - independently of which of these quantities is used to set the overall scale - the same results are obtained within a few percent. At finite temperature we use finer lattices down to a ≲ 0.1 fm. Our new results confirm completely our previous findings. We compare the results with those of the 'hotQCD' collaboration.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 805c-808c |
Journal | Nuclear Physics A |
Volume | 830 |
Issue number | 1-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1 2009 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics