TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos for Patient Education in Stapedectomy and Stapedotomy
AU - Durfee, Quentin C.
AU - Eberly, Hänel W.
AU - Sciscent, Bao Y.
AU - Meci, Andrew
AU - Choi, Rachel
AU - Whitaker, Mark
AU - Patel, Varun S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objective: YouTube is a video-sharing platform that patients frequently utilize. However, there are no objective assessments of the quality of information about otosclerosis on YouTube. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education via a cross-sectional study. We utilized 4 search phrases and analyzed them with 3 different scoring metrics, followed by statistical analysis. Results: Fifty videos were analyzed for the search terms “stapedectomy,” “stapedotomy,” “laser stapedotomy,” and “otosclerosis.” Most videos for “stapedotomy” (42%) and “otosclerosis” (41.2%) were intended for patients, while those for “stapedotomy” (48%) and “laser stapedotomy” (96%) were created for healthcare professionals or students. Higher modified DISCERN scores were associated with healthcare organization-produced videos for “otosclerosis” (P = .01964) and “stapedotomy” (P = .02842). Higher global quality score (P = .02964) and Journal of the American Medical Society scores (P = .01488) were significantly associated with videos made by verified users for “otosclerosis.” Conclusion: The quality of YouTube videos may not be sufficient for patient education on stapedectomy and stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Only 2 search terms included most videos geared toward patient education, while the other 2 terms had more videos for healthcare professionals. Lower transparency and reliability scores may give concerns about bias.
AB - Objective: YouTube is a video-sharing platform that patients frequently utilize. However, there are no objective assessments of the quality of information about otosclerosis on YouTube. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education via a cross-sectional study. We utilized 4 search phrases and analyzed them with 3 different scoring metrics, followed by statistical analysis. Results: Fifty videos were analyzed for the search terms “stapedectomy,” “stapedotomy,” “laser stapedotomy,” and “otosclerosis.” Most videos for “stapedotomy” (42%) and “otosclerosis” (41.2%) were intended for patients, while those for “stapedotomy” (48%) and “laser stapedotomy” (96%) were created for healthcare professionals or students. Higher modified DISCERN scores were associated with healthcare organization-produced videos for “otosclerosis” (P = .01964) and “stapedotomy” (P = .02842). Higher global quality score (P = .02964) and Journal of the American Medical Society scores (P = .01488) were significantly associated with videos made by verified users for “otosclerosis.” Conclusion: The quality of YouTube videos may not be sufficient for patient education on stapedectomy and stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Only 2 search terms included most videos geared toward patient education, while the other 2 terms had more videos for healthcare professionals. Lower transparency and reliability scores may give concerns about bias.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034596152
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034596152#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/01455613261438070
DO - 10.1177/01455613261438070
M3 - Article
C2 - 41906985
AN - SCOPUS:105034596152
SN - 0145-5613
JO - Ear, Nose and Throat Journal
JF - Ear, Nose and Throat Journal
ER -