TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality Talk
T2 - Developing Students’ Discourse to Promote High-level Comprehension
AU - Murphy, P. Karen
AU - Greene, Jeffrey A.
AU - Firetto, Carla M.
AU - Hendrick, Brendan D.
AU - Li, Mengyi
AU - Montalbano, Cristin
AU - Wei, Liwei
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the IES, USDE through Grant R305A130031 to the Pennsylvania State University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Institute or the USDE.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 AERA.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Students often struggle to comprehend complex text. In response, we conducted an initial, year-long study of Quality Talk, a teacher-facilitated, small-group discussion approach designed to enhance students’ basic and high-level comprehension, in two fourth-grade classrooms. Specifically, teachers delivered instructional mini-lessons on discourse elements (e.g., questioning or argumentation) and conducted weekly text-based discussions in their language arts classes. Analysis of the videorecorded discussions showed decreases in teacher-initiated discourse elements, indicating a release of responsibility to students, whereas students’ discourse reflected increased critical-analytic thinking (e.g., elaborated explanations or exploratory talk). Importantly, statistically and practically significant increases were evidenced on written measures of students’ basic and high-level comprehension, indicating the promise of small-group discourse as a way to foster individual student learning outcomes.
AB - Students often struggle to comprehend complex text. In response, we conducted an initial, year-long study of Quality Talk, a teacher-facilitated, small-group discussion approach designed to enhance students’ basic and high-level comprehension, in two fourth-grade classrooms. Specifically, teachers delivered instructional mini-lessons on discourse elements (e.g., questioning or argumentation) and conducted weekly text-based discussions in their language arts classes. Analysis of the videorecorded discussions showed decreases in teacher-initiated discourse elements, indicating a release of responsibility to students, whereas students’ discourse reflected increased critical-analytic thinking (e.g., elaborated explanations or exploratory talk). Importantly, statistically and practically significant increases were evidenced on written measures of students’ basic and high-level comprehension, indicating the promise of small-group discourse as a way to foster individual student learning outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053669639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053669639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3102/0002831218771303
DO - 10.3102/0002831218771303
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053669639
SN - 0002-8312
VL - 55
SP - 1113
EP - 1160
JO - American Educational Research Journal
JF - American Educational Research Journal
IS - 5
ER -