TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the ecological success of a community-based wildlife conservation area in Tanzania
AU - Lee, Derek E.
AU - Bond, Monica L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted with permission from the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Randilen Wildlife Management Area, and the villages of Mswakini, Lolkisale, and Emboret. We thank our funders at the Sacramento Zoo, Columbus Zoo, Tulsa Zoo, African Wildlife Foundation, and Rufford Foundation. We thank 2 anonymous reviewers for their constructive critiques, which improved the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Mammalogists.
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - In Tanzania, community-based natural resource management of wildlife occurs through the creation of Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs). WMAs consist of multiple villages designating land for wildlife conservation, and sharing a portion of subsequent tourism revenues. Nineteen WMAs are currently operating, encompassing 7% of Tanzania's land area, with 19 more WMAs planned. The ecological success or failure of WMAs for wildlife conservation has yet to be quantified. We defined ecological success in this case as significantly greater densities of wildlife and significantly lower densities of livestock in the WMA relative to the control site, after the WMA was established. We used 4 years of distance sampling surveys conducted 6 times per year for wild and domestic ungulates to quantify wildlife and livestock densities before and after the establishment and implementation of management efforts at Randilen WMA, relative to a control site on adjacent land of similar vegetation and habitat types. We documented similarity between the sites before WMA establishment, when both sites were managed by the same authority. After WMA establishment, we documented significantly higher densities of resident wildlife (giraffes and dik-diks) and lower densities of cattle in the WMA, relative to the control site, indicating short-term ecological success. Continued monitoring is necessary to determine longer-term effects, and to evaluate management decisions.
AB - In Tanzania, community-based natural resource management of wildlife occurs through the creation of Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs). WMAs consist of multiple villages designating land for wildlife conservation, and sharing a portion of subsequent tourism revenues. Nineteen WMAs are currently operating, encompassing 7% of Tanzania's land area, with 19 more WMAs planned. The ecological success or failure of WMAs for wildlife conservation has yet to be quantified. We defined ecological success in this case as significantly greater densities of wildlife and significantly lower densities of livestock in the WMA relative to the control site, after the WMA was established. We used 4 years of distance sampling surveys conducted 6 times per year for wild and domestic ungulates to quantify wildlife and livestock densities before and after the establishment and implementation of management efforts at Randilen WMA, relative to a control site on adjacent land of similar vegetation and habitat types. We documented similarity between the sites before WMA establishment, when both sites were managed by the same authority. After WMA establishment, we documented significantly higher densities of resident wildlife (giraffes and dik-diks) and lower densities of cattle in the WMA, relative to the control site, indicating short-term ecological success. Continued monitoring is necessary to determine longer-term effects, and to evaluate management decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045140037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045140037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jmammal/gyy014
DO - 10.1093/jmammal/gyy014
M3 - Article
C2 - 29867255
AN - SCOPUS:85045140037
SN - 0022-2372
VL - 99
SP - 459
EP - 464
JO - Journal of Mammalogy
JF - Journal of Mammalogy
IS - 2
ER -