TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the Value of Geologic Carbon Mineralization for Project Risk Management in Carbon Capture and Removal Pathways
AU - Menefee, Anne H.
AU - Schwartz, Brandon A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2024/3/21
Y1 - 2024/3/21
N2 - Carbon mineralization is the most secure form of carbon sequestration, but the value of mineral trapping relative to those of other mechanisms has not been quantified. Here, a techno-economic framework is developed to determine a levelized (investment) value of mineralization (LVOM) across a range of scenarios for CO2 capture or removal, injection schemes, and mineralization rates. LVOM considers both the direct value (in the form of reductions in upfront trust funds, monitoring requirements, and postinjection site care periods) and indirect value in the form of avoided leakage, where monetary impacts of leakage include tax/carbon credit forfeiture, remediation costs, and adjustment to the levelized cost of capture and injection. For a baseline mineralization scenario ranging from 0 to 2% avoided leakage, the LVOM increases up to $5.59/tCO2 for point-source emitters with a levelized cost of $62/tCO2 ($85/tCO2 credit) and to $9.29/tCO2 for DAC with a levelized cost of $150/tCO2 ($180/tCO2 credit). Across all scenarios, mineralization is most valuable for DAC facilities, which incur higher levelized costs offset by higher carbon credits (i.e., generate higher-value CO2). This result, combined with natural synergy between the relative location-independence of DAC and the location-dependence of reservoirs capable of mineralization, supports the strategic use of geologic carbon mineralization to support negative emission pathways.
AB - Carbon mineralization is the most secure form of carbon sequestration, but the value of mineral trapping relative to those of other mechanisms has not been quantified. Here, a techno-economic framework is developed to determine a levelized (investment) value of mineralization (LVOM) across a range of scenarios for CO2 capture or removal, injection schemes, and mineralization rates. LVOM considers both the direct value (in the form of reductions in upfront trust funds, monitoring requirements, and postinjection site care periods) and indirect value in the form of avoided leakage, where monetary impacts of leakage include tax/carbon credit forfeiture, remediation costs, and adjustment to the levelized cost of capture and injection. For a baseline mineralization scenario ranging from 0 to 2% avoided leakage, the LVOM increases up to $5.59/tCO2 for point-source emitters with a levelized cost of $62/tCO2 ($85/tCO2 credit) and to $9.29/tCO2 for DAC with a levelized cost of $150/tCO2 ($180/tCO2 credit). Across all scenarios, mineralization is most valuable for DAC facilities, which incur higher levelized costs offset by higher carbon credits (i.e., generate higher-value CO2). This result, combined with natural synergy between the relative location-independence of DAC and the location-dependence of reservoirs capable of mineralization, supports the strategic use of geologic carbon mineralization to support negative emission pathways.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186424845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186424845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00138
DO - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00138
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85186424845
SN - 0887-0624
VL - 38
SP - 5365
EP - 5373
JO - Energy and Fuels
JF - Energy and Fuels
IS - 6
ER -