Abstract
Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with "individualization" often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is neither designed nor executed in a way that can show whether an individual's fingerprint impressions are unique.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 521-533 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Statistical Review |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver