TY - JOUR
T1 - Race, ethnicity, and underemployment in nonmetropolitan America
T2 - A 30-year profile
AU - Slack, Tim
AU - Jensen, Leif
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Historically, rural racial and ethnic minorities have been among the most economically disadvantaged groups in the United States. Key to understanding economic deprivation is employment hardship, trends in which serve as a benchmark for progress toward racial and ethnic equality. We conceptualize employment hardship as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Surveys of 1968 through 1998, we find that (1) there are large and persistent racial and ethnic inequalities in underemployment prevalence; (2) these disadvantages are explained only partially by other predictors of underemployment; (3) nonmetropolitan (nonmetro) minorities are more likely than either all metropolitan (metro) or central-city minorities to be underemployed; (4) black-white inequality has held steady overall, though it has declined markedly in nonmetro areas; and (5) Hispanic-white inequality has increased; this trend, however, is restricted to metro areas, central cities in particular.
AB - Historically, rural racial and ethnic minorities have been among the most economically disadvantaged groups in the United States. Key to understanding economic deprivation is employment hardship, trends in which serve as a benchmark for progress toward racial and ethnic equality. We conceptualize employment hardship as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Surveys of 1968 through 1998, we find that (1) there are large and persistent racial and ethnic inequalities in underemployment prevalence; (2) these disadvantages are explained only partially by other predictors of underemployment; (3) nonmetropolitan (nonmetro) minorities are more likely than either all metropolitan (metro) or central-city minorities to be underemployed; (4) black-white inequality has held steady overall, though it has declined markedly in nonmetro areas; and (5) Hispanic-white inequality has increased; this trend, however, is restricted to metro areas, central cities in particular.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036299227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036299227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00101.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2002.tb00101.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036299227
SN - 0036-0112
VL - 67
SP - 208
EP - 233
JO - Rural Sociology
JF - Rural Sociology
IS - 2
ER -