Abstract
The individualistic fallacy (i.e., the fallacy of assuming that individual-level outcomes can be explained exclusively in terms of individual-level characteristics) is a problem with most research on violence, and is particularly problematic in research on mental disorder and violence. This article illustrates the importance of measuring community context by showing that race is not an important predictor of violence among persons with mental disorders when neighborhood disadvantage is controlled statistically. More generally, these results suggest that researchers run the risk of perpetuating the individualistic fallacy in studies of violence by persons with mental disorders when they use individual-level risk factors as predictors, but do not control for community context.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 449-456 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Law and human behavior |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Race, neighborhood disadvantage, and violence among persons with mental disorders: The importance of contextual measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver