TY - JOUR
T1 - Racial and Ethnic Inequality in Poverty and Affluence, 1959–2015
AU - Iceland, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - This paper examines patterns and trends in racial inequality in poverty and affluence over the 1959–2015 period. Analyzing data from decennial censuses and the American Community Survey, I find that that disparities have generally narrowed over the period. Nevertheless, considerable disparities remain, with whites least likely to be poor and Asians most likely to be affluent on the one hand, and blacks and American Indians much more likely to be poor and less likely to be affluent on the other—and Hispanics somewhat in between. Sociodemographic characteristics, such as education, family structure, and nativity explain some of the disparities—and an increasing proportion over the 1959–2015 period, indicative of the growing importance of disparities in human capital, the immigrant incorporation process, and the interaction between economic conditions and cultural shifts in attitudes toward marriage in explaining racial inequality in poverty and affluence. There also are still significant portions of the gaps that remain unexplained, especially for blacks and American Indians. The presence of this unexplained gap indicates that other factors are still at work in producing these disparities, although their effects have declined over time.
AB - This paper examines patterns and trends in racial inequality in poverty and affluence over the 1959–2015 period. Analyzing data from decennial censuses and the American Community Survey, I find that that disparities have generally narrowed over the period. Nevertheless, considerable disparities remain, with whites least likely to be poor and Asians most likely to be affluent on the one hand, and blacks and American Indians much more likely to be poor and less likely to be affluent on the other—and Hispanics somewhat in between. Sociodemographic characteristics, such as education, family structure, and nativity explain some of the disparities—and an increasing proportion over the 1959–2015 period, indicative of the growing importance of disparities in human capital, the immigrant incorporation process, and the interaction between economic conditions and cultural shifts in attitudes toward marriage in explaining racial inequality in poverty and affluence. There also are still significant portions of the gaps that remain unexplained, especially for blacks and American Indians. The presence of this unexplained gap indicates that other factors are still at work in producing these disparities, although their effects have declined over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060670631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060670631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11113-019-09512-7
DO - 10.1007/s11113-019-09512-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 31885410
AN - SCOPUS:85060670631
SN - 0167-5923
VL - 38
SP - 615
EP - 654
JO - Population Research and Policy Review
JF - Population Research and Policy Review
IS - 5
ER -