Radiation dose variation in fluoroscopic imaging: Is What You Get, What You See?

Charles E. Chambers

doi:10.1002/ccd.26246

Radiation dose variation in fluoroscopic imaging: Is What You Get, What You See?

Charles E. Chambers

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Variations in dose exist amongst various imaging systems and in various acquisition angulations; this is not a new finding. Assessment of Image quality should accompany an assessment of dose, as these complement each other. Routine assessment of dose and image quality with potential comparisons amongst operators, laboratories, and imaging systems may prove beneficial for radiation safety in interventional cardiology practice.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	933-934
Number of pages	2
Journal	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume	86
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26246
State	Published - Nov 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1002/ccd.26246

Cite this

@article{66eca7df916d4c3dbda37ce354fc0212,

title = "Radiation dose variation in fluoroscopic imaging: Is What You Get, What You See?",

abstract = "Variations in dose exist amongst various imaging systems and in various acquisition angulations; this is not a new finding. Assessment of Image quality should accompany an assessment of dose, as these complement each other. Routine assessment of dose and image quality with potential comparisons amongst operators, laboratories, and imaging systems may prove beneficial for radiation safety in interventional cardiology practice.",

author = "Chambers, {Charles E.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.26246",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "86",

pages = "933--934",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",

publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiation dose variation in fluoroscopic imaging

T2 - Is What You Get, What You See?

AU - Chambers, Charles E.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Variations in dose exist amongst various imaging systems and in various acquisition angulations; this is not a new finding. Assessment of Image quality should accompany an assessment of dose, as these complement each other. Routine assessment of dose and image quality with potential comparisons amongst operators, laboratories, and imaging systems may prove beneficial for radiation safety in interventional cardiology practice.

AB - Variations in dose exist amongst various imaging systems and in various acquisition angulations; this is not a new finding. Assessment of Image quality should accompany an assessment of dose, as these complement each other. Routine assessment of dose and image quality with potential comparisons amongst operators, laboratories, and imaging systems may prove beneficial for radiation safety in interventional cardiology practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944905832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944905832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.26246

DO - 10.1002/ccd.26246

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26490807

AN - SCOPUS:84944905832

SN - 1522-1946

VL - 86

SP - 933

EP - 934

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

IS - 5

ER -

Radiation dose variation in fluoroscopic imaging: Is What You Get, What You See?

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this