TY - JOUR
T1 - Radical Administrative Law
AU - Havasy, Christopher S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Vanderbilt Law Review. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/20
Y1 - 2024/4/20
N2 - The administrative state is under attack. Judges and scholars increasingly question why agencies should have such large powers to coerce citizens without adequate democratic accountability. Rather than refuting these critics, this Article accepts that in scrutinizing the massive powers that agencies hold over citizens, these critics have a point. However, their solution—to augment the powers of Congress or the President over agencies to instill indirect democratic accountability—is one step too quick. We should first examine whether direct democratic accountability of agencies by the citizenry is possible.
AB - The administrative state is under attack. Judges and scholars increasingly question why agencies should have such large powers to coerce citizens without adequate democratic accountability. Rather than refuting these critics, this Article accepts that in scrutinizing the massive powers that agencies hold over citizens, these critics have a point. However, their solution—to augment the powers of Congress or the President over agencies to instill indirect democratic accountability—is one step too quick. We should first examine whether direct democratic accountability of agencies by the citizenry is possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192168001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85192168001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85192168001
SN - 0042-2533
VL - 77
SP - 647
EP - 722
JO - Vanderbilt Law Review
JF - Vanderbilt Law Review
IS - 3
ER -