Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

Rajeev Sharma

doi:10.4103/0973-1482.43152

Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

Rajeev Sharma

Department of Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	144
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics
Volume	4
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.43152
State	Published - Jul 1 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Oncology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.4103/0973-1482.43152

Cite this

@article{69cbbb3871ef4e1a99365b18b65c3287,

title = "Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection",

author = "Rajeev Sharma",

year = "2008",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.4103/0973-1482.43152",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "144",

journal = "Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics",

issn = "0973-1482",

publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

AU - Sharma, Rajeev

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/53749093522

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/53749093522#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.4103/0973-1482.43152

DO - 10.4103/0973-1482.43152

M3 - Letter

C2 - 18923210

AN - SCOPUS:53749093522

SN - 0973-1482

VL - 4

SP - 144

JO - Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

IS - 3

ER -

Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this