RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward

Hani Abujudeh; Robert S. Pyatt; Michael A. Bruno; Alison L. Chetlen; David Buck; Susan K. Hobbs; Christopher Roth; Charles Truwit; Rajan Agarwal; Scott T.O. Kennedy; Lucille Glenn

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004

RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward

Hani Abujudeh, Robert S. Pyatt, Michael A. Bruno, Alison L. Chetlen, David Buck, Susan K. Hobbs, Christopher Roth, Charles Truwit, Rajan Agarwal, Scott T.O. Kennedy, Lucille Glenn

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	899-904
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
Volume	11
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004
State	Published - Sep 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004

Cite this

@article{2e15de0fc208459bb311f85a2459618a,

title = "RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward",

abstract = "RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership.",

author = "Hani Abujudeh and Pyatt, {Robert S.} and Bruno, {Michael A.} and Chetlen, {Alison L.} and David Buck and Hobbs, {Susan K.} and Christopher Roth and Charles Truwit and Rajan Agarwal and Kennedy, {Scott T.O.} and Lucille Glenn",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "899--904",

journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR",

issn = "1558-349X",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RADPEER peer review

T2 - relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward

AU - Abujudeh, Hani

AU - Pyatt, Robert S.

AU - Bruno, Michael A.

AU - Chetlen, Alison L.

AU - Buck, David

AU - Hobbs, Susan K.

AU - Roth, Christopher

AU - Truwit, Charles

AU - Agarwal, Rajan

AU - Kennedy, Scott T.O.

AU - Glenn, Lucille

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership.

AB - RADPEER is a product developed by the ACR that aims to assist radiologists with quality assessment and improvement through peer review. The program opened in 2002, was initially offered to physician groups in 2003, developed an electronic version in 2005 (eRADPEER), revised the scoring system in 2009, and first surveyed the RADPEER membership in 2010. In 2012, a survey was sent to 16,000 ACR member radiologists, both users and nonusers of RADPEER, with the goal of understanding how to make RADPEER more relevant to its members. A total of 31 questions were used, some of which were repeated from the 2010 survey. The ACR's RADPEER committee has published 3 papers on the program since its inception. In this report, the authors summarize the survey results and suggest future opportunities for making RADPEER more useful to its membership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027949896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027949896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.02.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 24842585

AN - SCOPUS:85027949896

SN - 1558-349X

VL - 11

SP - 899

EP - 904

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR

IS - 9

ER -

RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this