TY - GEN
T1 - Randomized distributed agreement revisited
AU - Berman, Piotr
AU - Garay, Juan A.
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - Distributed Agreement (DA) is one of the fundamental problems in the theory and practice of fault-tolerant distributed systems. It requires correct processors (agents, players) to agree on an initial value held by one of them, despite the (even malicious) behavior of a subset of size t. A randomized solution to the problem achieves agreement with a high probability after a constant number of communication rounds. In this paper we present a succinct and efficient randomized DA protocol for asynchronous networks that works for n > 5t processors, where n is the size of the network. The protocol has low communication complexity (Θ(log n) message size) and does not require an cryptographic assumption. The protocol belongs to the class of protocols that require a `trusted dealer,' who is in charge of a suitable network initialization, and represents an improvement in terms of number of processors to previous solutions presented in. We contrast our approach to the class of protocols that are currently able to perform randomized agreement from scratch, an unlimited number of times, but have a communication cost that might be infeasible in many cases.
AB - Distributed Agreement (DA) is one of the fundamental problems in the theory and practice of fault-tolerant distributed systems. It requires correct processors (agents, players) to agree on an initial value held by one of them, despite the (even malicious) behavior of a subset of size t. A randomized solution to the problem achieves agreement with a high probability after a constant number of communication rounds. In this paper we present a succinct and efficient randomized DA protocol for asynchronous networks that works for n > 5t processors, where n is the size of the network. The protocol has low communication complexity (Θ(log n) message size) and does not require an cryptographic assumption. The protocol belongs to the class of protocols that require a `trusted dealer,' who is in charge of a suitable network initialization, and represents an improvement in terms of number of processors to previous solutions presented in. We contrast our approach to the class of protocols that are currently able to perform randomized agreement from scratch, an unlimited number of times, but have a communication cost that might be infeasible in many cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027868957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027868957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:0027868957
SN - 0818636823
T3 - Digest of Papers - International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing
SP - 412
EP - 419
BT - Digest of Papers - International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing
A2 - Anon, null
PB - Publ by IEEE
T2 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing
Y2 - 22 June 1993 through 24 June 1993
ER -