TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Phase II Study of Paclitaxel plus Alisertib versus Paclitaxel plus Placebo as Second-Line Therapy for SCLC
T2 - Primary and Correlative Biomarker Analyses
AU - C14018 study investigators
AU - Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
AU - Niu, Huifeng
AU - Nackaerts, Kristiaan
AU - Csoszi, Tibor
AU - Ostoros, Gyula
AU - Mark, Zsuzsanna
AU - Baik, Christina
AU - Joy, Anil Abraham
AU - Chouaid, Christos
AU - Jaime, Jesus Corral
AU - Kolek, Vitezslav
AU - Majem, Margarita
AU - Roubec, Jaromir
AU - Santos, Edgardo S.
AU - Chiang, Anne C.
AU - Speranza, Giovanna
AU - Belani, Chandra P.
AU - Chiappori, Alberto
AU - Patel, Manish R.
AU - Czebe, Krisztina
AU - Byers, Lauren
AU - Bahamon, Brittany
AU - Li, Cong
AU - Sheldon-Waniga, Emily
AU - Kong, Eric F.
AU - Williams, Miguel
AU - Badola, Sunita
AU - Shin, Hyunjin
AU - Bedford, Lisa
AU - Ecsedy, Jeffrey A.
AU - Bryant, Matthew
AU - Jones, Sian
AU - Simmons, John
AU - Leonard, E. Jane
AU - Ullmann, Claudio Dansky
AU - Spigel, David R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Introduction: We assessed the Aurora A kinase inhibitor, alisertib, plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as alisertib/paclitaxel) as second-line treatment for SCLC. Methods: In this double-blind study, patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC were stratified by relapse type (sensitive versus resistant or refractory) and brain metastases and randomized 1:1 to alisertib/paclitaxel or placebo plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as placebo/paclitaxel) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Associations of c-Myc expression in tumor tissue (prespecified) and genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (retrospective) with clinical outcome were evaluated. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled (89 in each arm). The median PFS was 3.32 months with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 2.17 months with placebo/paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence limit [CI]: 0.557–1.067, p = 0.113 in the intent-to-treat population versus HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.509–0.985, p = 0.038 with corrected analysis applied). Among 140 patients with genetic alternations, patients with cell cycle regulator mutations (cyclin-dependent kinase 6 gene [CDK6], retinoblastoma-like 1 gene [RBL1], retinoblastoma-like 2 gene [RBL2], and retinoblastoma 1 gene [RB1]) had significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel versus with placebo/paclitaxel (3.68 versus 1.80 months, respectively [HR = 0.395, 95% CI: 0.239–0.654, p = 0.0003]), and overall survival (7.20 versus 4.47 months, respectively [HR = 0.427, 95% CI: 0.259–0.704, p = 0.00085]). A subset of patients with c-Myc expression showed significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel. The incidence of grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events was 67% (58 patients) with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 22% (25 patients) with placebo/paclitaxel. Twelve patients (14%) versus 11 (12%) died on study, including four versus zero treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Efficacy signals were seen with alisertib/paclitaxel in relapsed or refractory SCLC. c-Myc expression and mutations in cell cycle regulators may be potential predictive biomarkers of alisertib efficacy; further prospective validations are warranted.
AB - Introduction: We assessed the Aurora A kinase inhibitor, alisertib, plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as alisertib/paclitaxel) as second-line treatment for SCLC. Methods: In this double-blind study, patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC were stratified by relapse type (sensitive versus resistant or refractory) and brain metastases and randomized 1:1 to alisertib/paclitaxel or placebo plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as placebo/paclitaxel) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Associations of c-Myc expression in tumor tissue (prespecified) and genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (retrospective) with clinical outcome were evaluated. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled (89 in each arm). The median PFS was 3.32 months with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 2.17 months with placebo/paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence limit [CI]: 0.557–1.067, p = 0.113 in the intent-to-treat population versus HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.509–0.985, p = 0.038 with corrected analysis applied). Among 140 patients with genetic alternations, patients with cell cycle regulator mutations (cyclin-dependent kinase 6 gene [CDK6], retinoblastoma-like 1 gene [RBL1], retinoblastoma-like 2 gene [RBL2], and retinoblastoma 1 gene [RB1]) had significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel versus with placebo/paclitaxel (3.68 versus 1.80 months, respectively [HR = 0.395, 95% CI: 0.239–0.654, p = 0.0003]), and overall survival (7.20 versus 4.47 months, respectively [HR = 0.427, 95% CI: 0.259–0.704, p = 0.00085]). A subset of patients with c-Myc expression showed significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel. The incidence of grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events was 67% (58 patients) with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 22% (25 patients) with placebo/paclitaxel. Twelve patients (14%) versus 11 (12%) died on study, including four versus zero treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Efficacy signals were seen with alisertib/paclitaxel in relapsed or refractory SCLC. c-Myc expression and mutations in cell cycle regulators may be potential predictive biomarkers of alisertib efficacy; further prospective validations are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076252407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076252407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 31655296
AN - SCOPUS:85076252407
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 15
SP - 274
EP - 287
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 2
ER -