TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-time observation of apathy in long-term care residents with Dementia
T2 - Reliability of the Person-Environment Apathy Rating Scale
AU - Jao, Ying Ling
AU - Mogle, Jacqueline
AU - Williams, Kristine
AU - McDermott, Caroline
AU - Behrens, Liza
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Apathy is prevalent in individuals with dementia. Lack of responsiveness to environmental stimulation is a key characteristic of apathy. The Person-Environment Apathy Rating (PEAR) scale consists of environment and apathy subscales, which allow for examination of environmental impact on apathy. The interrater reliability of the PEAR scale was examined via real-time observation. The current study included 45 observations of 15 longterm care residents with dementia. Each participant was observed at three time points for 10 minutes each. Two raters observed the participant and surrounding environment and independently rated the participant's apathy and environmental stimulation using the PEAR scale. Weighted Kappa was 0.5 to 0.82 for the PEAR-Environment subscale and 0.5 to 0.8 for the PEAR-Apathy subscale. Overall, with the exception of three items with relatively weak reliability (0.50 to 0.56), the PEAR scale showed moderate to strong interrater reliability (0.63 to 0.82). The results support the use of the PEAR scale to measure environmental stimulation and apathy via real-time observation in long-term care residents with dementia.
AB - Apathy is prevalent in individuals with dementia. Lack of responsiveness to environmental stimulation is a key characteristic of apathy. The Person-Environment Apathy Rating (PEAR) scale consists of environment and apathy subscales, which allow for examination of environmental impact on apathy. The interrater reliability of the PEAR scale was examined via real-time observation. The current study included 45 observations of 15 longterm care residents with dementia. Each participant was observed at three time points for 10 minutes each. Two raters observed the participant and surrounding environment and independently rated the participant's apathy and environmental stimulation using the PEAR scale. Weighted Kappa was 0.5 to 0.82 for the PEAR-Environment subscale and 0.5 to 0.8 for the PEAR-Apathy subscale. Overall, with the exception of three items with relatively weak reliability (0.50 to 0.56), the PEAR scale showed moderate to strong interrater reliability (0.63 to 0.82). The results support the use of the PEAR scale to measure environmental stimulation and apathy via real-time observation in long-term care residents with dementia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044967082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044967082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/00989134-20180131-02
DO - 10.3928/00989134-20180131-02
M3 - Article
C2 - 29437184
AN - SCOPUS:85044967082
SN - 0098-9134
VL - 44
SP - 23
EP - 28
JO - Journal of gerontological nursing
JF - Journal of gerontological nursing
IS - 4
ER -