TY - JOUR
T1 - Recent smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 among individuals with recent respiratory symptoms
AU - GCCR Group
AU - Gerkin, Richard C.
AU - Ohla, Kathrin
AU - Veldhuizen, Maria G.
AU - Joseph, Paule V.
AU - Kelly, Christine E.
AU - Bakke, Alyssa J.
AU - Steele, Kimberley E.
AU - Farruggia, Michael C.
AU - Pellegrino, Robert
AU - Pepino, Marta Y.
AU - Bouysset, Cédric
AU - Soler, Graciela M.
AU - Pereda-Loth, Veronica
AU - Dibattista, Michele
AU - Cooper, Keiland W.
AU - Croijmans, Ilja
AU - Di Pizio, Antonella
AU - Ozdener, Mehmet Hakan
AU - Fjaeldstad, Alexander W.
AU - Lin, Cailu
AU - Sandell, Mari A.
AU - Singh, Preet B.
AU - Brindha, V. Evelyn
AU - Olsson, Shannon B.
AU - Saraiva, Luis R.
AU - Ahuja, Gaurav
AU - Alwashahi, Mohammed K.
AU - Bhutani, Surabhi
AU - D’Errico, Anna
AU - Fornazieri, Marco A.
AU - Golebiowski, Jérôme
AU - Hwang, Liang Dar
AU - Öztürk, Lina
AU - Roura, Eugeni
AU - Spinelli, Sara
AU - Whitcroft, Katherine L.
AU - Faraji, Farhoud
AU - Fischmeister, Florian Ph S.
AU - Heinbockel, Thomas
AU - Hsieh, Julien W.
AU - Huart, Caroline
AU - Konstantinidis, Iordanis
AU - Menini, Anna
AU - Morini, Gabriella
AU - Olofsson, Jonas K.
AU - Philpott, Carl M.
AU - Pierron, Denis
AU - Shields, Vonnie D.C.
AU - Voznessenskaya, Vera V.
AU - Hayes, John E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In a preregistered, cross-sectional study, we investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19 using a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0–100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n = 4148) or negative (C19−; n = 546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified univariate and multivariate predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. Both C19+ and C19− groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean ± SD, C19+: −82.5 ± 27.2 points; C19−: −59.8 ± 37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both univariate and multivariate models (ROC AUC = 0.72). Additional variables provide negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms (e.g., fever). Olfactory recovery within 40 days of respiratory symptom onset was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since respiratory symptom onset. We find that quantified smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 amongst those with symptoms of respiratory illness. To aid clinicians and contact tracers in identifying individuals with a high likelihood of having COVID-19, we propose a novel 0–10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss, the ODoR-19. We find that numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4 < OR < 10). Once independently validated, this tool could be deployed when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.
AB - In a preregistered, cross-sectional study, we investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19 using a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0–100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n = 4148) or negative (C19−; n = 546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified univariate and multivariate predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. Both C19+ and C19− groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean ± SD, C19+: −82.5 ± 27.2 points; C19−: −59.8 ± 37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both univariate and multivariate models (ROC AUC = 0.72). Additional variables provide negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms (e.g., fever). Olfactory recovery within 40 days of respiratory symptom onset was reported for ~50% of participants and was best predicted by time since respiratory symptom onset. We find that quantified smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19 amongst those with symptoms of respiratory illness. To aid clinicians and contact tracers in identifying individuals with a high likelihood of having COVID-19, we propose a novel 0–10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss, the ODoR-19. We find that numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4 < OR < 10). Once independently validated, this tool could be deployed when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100834676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100834676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/chemse/bjaa081
DO - 10.1093/chemse/bjaa081
M3 - Article
C2 - 33367502
AN - SCOPUS:85100834676
SN - 0379-864X
VL - 46
JO - Chemical senses
JF - Chemical senses
ER -