Recognizing multiple interpretations in 2 1/2 d machining of pockets

Y. J. Tseng, S. B. Joshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


To integrate CAD and CAM of 2 1/2 D prismatic machining parts, part descriptions in low-level format, such as Boundary Representation, are typically interpreted into forms of high-level features, such as pockets and virtual pockets, to facilitate process planning and tool path generation. A recognition procedure is required to transform the low-level data into machinable pocket definition. For complex depression volume where pocket interactions occur, current feature recognition algorithms do not adequately recognize the pockets such that the complex depression volume can be transformed into individual pockets machinable by current pocket milling techniques. Furthermore, in a complex depression, there may exist multiple equally valid set of pockets to describe the same total removable volume. The problem of recognizing multiple interpretations of pockets from part description in Boundary Representation (Brep) is presented in this paper. The algorithm presented in this paper first uses volume decomposition to decompose the total removable volume into small blocks of machinable volume. Then based on machining strategies of 2 1/2 D pockets, the small blocks are reconnected in a systematic way to reconstruct pocket volumes and generate multiple interpretations. The result provides multiple sets of pockets, and hence shows that there are multiple ways to machine a part with interacting pockets. Sample results demonstrating the implementation and the capabilities of the algorithms are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1063-1068
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Production Research
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1994

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering


Dive into the research topics of 'Recognizing multiple interpretations in 2 1/2 d machining of pockets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this