TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for advancing mixoplankton research through empirical-model integration
AU - Millette, Nicole C.
AU - Leles, Suzana G.
AU - Johnson, Matthew D.
AU - Maloney, Ashley E.
AU - Brownlee, Emily F.
AU - Cohen, Natalie R.
AU - Duhamel, Solange
AU - Poulton, Nicole J.
AU - Princiotta, Sarah D.
AU - Stamieszkin, Karen
AU - Wilken, Susanne
AU - Moeller, Holly V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Millette, Leles, Johnson, Maloney, Brownlee, Cohen, Duhamel, Poulton, Princiotta, Stamieszkin, Wilken and Moeller.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Protist plankton can be divided into three main groups: phytoplankton, zooplankton, and mixoplankton. In situ methods for studying phytoplankton and zooplankton are relatively straightforward since they generally target chlorophyll/photosynthesis or grazing activity, while the integration of both processes within a single cell makes mixoplankton inherently challenging to study. As a result, we understand less about mixoplankton physiology and their role in food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and ecosystems compared to phytoplankton and zooplankton. In this paper, we posit that by merging conventional techniques, such as microscopy and physiological data, with innovative methods like in situ single-cell sorting and omics datasets, in conjunction with a diverse array of modeling approaches ranging from single-cell modeling to comprehensive Earth system models, we can propel mixoplankton research into the forefront of aquatic ecology. We present eight crucial research questions pertaining to mixoplankton and mixotrophy, and briefly outline a combination of existing methods and models that can be used to address each question. Our intent is to encourage more interdisciplinary research on mixoplankton, thereby expanding the scope of data acquisition and knowledge accumulation for this understudied yet critical component of aquatic ecosystems.
AB - Protist plankton can be divided into three main groups: phytoplankton, zooplankton, and mixoplankton. In situ methods for studying phytoplankton and zooplankton are relatively straightforward since they generally target chlorophyll/photosynthesis or grazing activity, while the integration of both processes within a single cell makes mixoplankton inherently challenging to study. As a result, we understand less about mixoplankton physiology and their role in food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and ecosystems compared to phytoplankton and zooplankton. In this paper, we posit that by merging conventional techniques, such as microscopy and physiological data, with innovative methods like in situ single-cell sorting and omics datasets, in conjunction with a diverse array of modeling approaches ranging from single-cell modeling to comprehensive Earth system models, we can propel mixoplankton research into the forefront of aquatic ecology. We present eight crucial research questions pertaining to mixoplankton and mixotrophy, and briefly outline a combination of existing methods and models that can be used to address each question. Our intent is to encourage more interdisciplinary research on mixoplankton, thereby expanding the scope of data acquisition and knowledge accumulation for this understudied yet critical component of aquatic ecosystems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196314944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196314944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2024.1392673
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2024.1392673
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85196314944
SN - 2296-7745
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
M1 - 1392673
ER -