Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology

  • André Homeyer
  • , Christian Geißler
  • , Lars Ole Schwen
  • , Falk Zakrzewski
  • , Theodore Evans
  • , Klaus Strohmenger
  • , Max Westphal
  • , Roman David Bülow
  • , Michaela Kargl
  • , Aray Karjauv
  • , Isidre Munné-Bertran
  • , Carl Orge Retzlaff
  • , Adrià Romero-López
  • , Tomasz Sołtysiński
  • , Markus Plass
  • , Rita Carvalho
  • , Peter Steinbach
  • , Yu Chia Lan
  • , Nassim Bouteldja
  • , David Haber
  • Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Alireza Vafaei Sadr, Matthias Kraft, Daniel Krüger, Rutger Fick, Tobias Lang, Peter Boor, Heimo Müller, Peter Hufnagl, Norman Zerbe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that automatically extract information from digital histology images have shown great promise for improving pathological diagnosis. Prior to routine use, it is important to evaluate their predictive performance and obtain regulatory approval. This assessment requires appropriate test datasets. However, compiling such datasets is challenging and specific recommendations are missing. A committee of various stakeholders, including commercial AI developers, pathologists, and researchers, discussed key aspects and conducted extensive literature reviews on test datasets in pathology. Here, we summarize the results and derive general recommendations on compiling test datasets. We address several questions: Which and how many images are needed? How to deal with low-prevalence subsets? How can potential bias be detected? How should datasets be reported? What are the regulatory requirements in different countries? The recommendations are intended to help AI developers demonstrate the utility of their products and to help pathologists and regulatory agencies verify reported performance measures. Further research is needed to formulate criteria for sufficiently representative test datasets so that AI solutions can operate with less user intervention and better support diagnostic workflows in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1759-1769
Number of pages11
JournalModern Pathology
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations on compiling test datasets for evaluating artificial intelligence solutions in pathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this