Abstract
After criticizing current models of political action committee (PAC) formation as flawed both in the samples used in tests and in the specifications tested, we develop a new explanation of PAC formation that emphasizes competition for access among those already engaged in lobbying. We test both organization- and state-level implications of this alternative account, respectively, employing survey and aggregate data on PACs in the American states. The empirical findings provide preliminary support for our explanation and sharply contradict prior evidence that PAC formation is governed by problems of free riding.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-346 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | American Politics Research |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1997 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconceptualizing PAC formation: It's not a collective action problem, and it may be an arms race'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver