TY - JOUR
T1 - Recruiting clinical personnel as research participants
T2 - A framework for assessing feasibility
AU - Hysong, Sylvia J.
AU - Smitham, Kristen B.
AU - Knox, Melissa
AU - Johnson, Khai El
AU - SoRelle, Richard
AU - Haidet, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is the result of work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (grant no. IIR 09–095), and supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence (HFP90-020) at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the US government, Penn State University Hershey Medical College, Meharry Medical College, or Baylor College of Medicine.
PY - 2013/10/24
Y1 - 2013/10/24
N2 - Increasing numbers of research studies test interventions for clinicians in addition to or instead of interventions for patients. Although previous studies have enumerated barriers to patient enrolment in clinical trials, corresponding barriers have not been identified for enrolling clinicians as subjects. We propose a framework of metrics for evidence-based estimation of time and resources required for recruiting clinicians as research participants, and present an example from a federally funded study. Our framework proposes metrics for tracking five steps in the recruitment process: gaining entry into facilities, obtaining accurate eligibility and contact information, reaching busy clinicians, assessing willingness to participate, and scheduling participants for data collection. We analyzed recruitment records from a qualitative study exploring performance feedback at US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs); five recruiters sought to reach two clinicians at 16 facilities for a one-hour interview. Objective metrics were calculable for all five steps; metric values varied considerably across facilities. Obtaining accurate contact information slowed down recruiting the most. We conclude that successfully recruiting even small numbers of employees requires considerable resourcefulness and more calendar time than anticipated. Our proposed framework provides an empirical basis for estimating research-recruitment timelines, planning subject-recruitment strategies, and assessing the research accessibility of clinical sites.
AB - Increasing numbers of research studies test interventions for clinicians in addition to or instead of interventions for patients. Although previous studies have enumerated barriers to patient enrolment in clinical trials, corresponding barriers have not been identified for enrolling clinicians as subjects. We propose a framework of metrics for evidence-based estimation of time and resources required for recruiting clinicians as research participants, and present an example from a federally funded study. Our framework proposes metrics for tracking five steps in the recruitment process: gaining entry into facilities, obtaining accurate eligibility and contact information, reaching busy clinicians, assessing willingness to participate, and scheduling participants for data collection. We analyzed recruitment records from a qualitative study exploring performance feedback at US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs); five recruiters sought to reach two clinicians at 16 facilities for a one-hour interview. Objective metrics were calculable for all five steps; metric values varied considerably across facilities. Obtaining accurate contact information slowed down recruiting the most. We conclude that successfully recruiting even small numbers of employees requires considerable resourcefulness and more calendar time than anticipated. Our proposed framework provides an empirical basis for estimating research-recruitment timelines, planning subject-recruitment strategies, and assessing the research accessibility of clinical sites.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886064203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886064203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-8-125
DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-8-125
M3 - Article
C2 - 24153049
AN - SCOPUS:84886064203
SN - 1748-5908
VL - 8
JO - Implementation Science
JF - Implementation Science
IS - 1
M1 - 125
ER -