Refining the definition of biochemical failure in the era of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: The Phoenix definition and beyond: Definition of BCF in Prostate SBRT

  • Ting Martin Ma
  • , Soumyajit Roy
  • , Xue Wu
  • , Constantine Mantz
  • , Donald Fuller
  • , Leszek Miszczyk
  • , Alexandra Napieralska
  • , Agnieska Namysł-Kaletka
  • , Hilary P. Bagshaw
  • , Mark K. Buyyounouski
  • , Rachel Glicksman
  • , D. Andrew Loblaw
  • , Alan Katz
  • , Shrinivasa K. Upadhyaya
  • , Nicholas Nickols
  • , Michael L. Steinberg
  • , Rebecca Philipson
  • , Nima Aghdam
  • , Simeng Suy
  • , Abigail Pepin
  • Sean P. Collins, Paul Boutros, Matthew B. Rettig, Jeremie Calais, Ming Wang, Nicholas Zaorsky, Amar U. Kishan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Phoenix definition for biochemical failure (BCF) after radiotherapy uses nadir PSA (nPSA) + 2 ng/mL to classify a BCF and was derived from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, which produces significantly higher nPSAs than stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated whether an alternative nPSA-based threshold could be used to define post-SBRT BCFs. Materials and methods: PSA kinetics data on 2038 patients from 9 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with SBRT without ADT. We evaluated the performance of various nPSA-based definitions. We also investigated the relationship of relative PSA decline (rPSA, PSA18month/PSA6month) and timing of reaching nPSA + 2 with BCF. Results: Median follow-up was 71.9 months. BCF occurred in 6.9% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.16 ng/mL. False positivity of nPSA + 2 was 30.2%, compared to 40.9%, 57.8%, and 71.0% for nPSA + 1.5, nPSA + 1.0, and nPSA + 0.5, respectively. Among patients with BCF, the median lead time gained from an earlier nPSA + threshold definition over the Phoenix definition was minimal. Patients with BCF had significantly lower rates of early PSA decline (mean rPSA 1.19 vs. 0.39, p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to reach nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months (83.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.0001). The proposed criterion (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months) had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.4% and 81.5%, respectively, for predicting BCF in patients meeting the Phoenix definition and decreased its false positivity to 6.4%. Conclusion: The Phoenix definition remains an excellent definition for BCF post-SBRT. Its high false positivity can be mitigated by applying additional criteria (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or time to nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume166
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refining the definition of biochemical failure in the era of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: The Phoenix definition and beyond: Definition of BCF in Prostate SBRT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this