TY - JOUR
T1 - Refining the definition of biochemical failure in the era of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer
T2 - The Phoenix definition and beyond: Definition of BCF in Prostate SBRT
AU - Ma, Ting Martin
AU - Roy, Soumyajit
AU - Wu, Xue
AU - Mantz, Constantine
AU - Fuller, Donald
AU - Miszczyk, Leszek
AU - Napieralska, Alexandra
AU - Namysł-Kaletka, Agnieska
AU - Bagshaw, Hilary P.
AU - Buyyounouski, Mark K.
AU - Glicksman, Rachel
AU - Loblaw, D. Andrew
AU - Katz, Alan
AU - Upadhyaya, Shrinivasa K.
AU - Nickols, Nicholas
AU - Steinberg, Michael L.
AU - Philipson, Rebecca
AU - Aghdam, Nima
AU - Suy, Simeng
AU - Pepin, Abigail
AU - Collins, Sean P.
AU - Boutros, Paul
AU - Rettig, Matthew B.
AU - Calais, Jeremie
AU - Wang, Ming
AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas
AU - Kishan, Amar U.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background and purpose: The Phoenix definition for biochemical failure (BCF) after radiotherapy uses nadir PSA (nPSA) + 2 ng/mL to classify a BCF and was derived from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, which produces significantly higher nPSAs than stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated whether an alternative nPSA-based threshold could be used to define post-SBRT BCFs. Materials and methods: PSA kinetics data on 2038 patients from 9 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with SBRT without ADT. We evaluated the performance of various nPSA-based definitions. We also investigated the relationship of relative PSA decline (rPSA, PSA18month/PSA6month) and timing of reaching nPSA + 2 with BCF. Results: Median follow-up was 71.9 months. BCF occurred in 6.9% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.16 ng/mL. False positivity of nPSA + 2 was 30.2%, compared to 40.9%, 57.8%, and 71.0% for nPSA + 1.5, nPSA + 1.0, and nPSA + 0.5, respectively. Among patients with BCF, the median lead time gained from an earlier nPSA + threshold definition over the Phoenix definition was minimal. Patients with BCF had significantly lower rates of early PSA decline (mean rPSA 1.19 vs. 0.39, p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to reach nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months (83.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.0001). The proposed criterion (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months) had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.4% and 81.5%, respectively, for predicting BCF in patients meeting the Phoenix definition and decreased its false positivity to 6.4%. Conclusion: The Phoenix definition remains an excellent definition for BCF post-SBRT. Its high false positivity can be mitigated by applying additional criteria (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or time to nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months).
AB - Background and purpose: The Phoenix definition for biochemical failure (BCF) after radiotherapy uses nadir PSA (nPSA) + 2 ng/mL to classify a BCF and was derived from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, which produces significantly higher nPSAs than stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated whether an alternative nPSA-based threshold could be used to define post-SBRT BCFs. Materials and methods: PSA kinetics data on 2038 patients from 9 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with SBRT without ADT. We evaluated the performance of various nPSA-based definitions. We also investigated the relationship of relative PSA decline (rPSA, PSA18month/PSA6month) and timing of reaching nPSA + 2 with BCF. Results: Median follow-up was 71.9 months. BCF occurred in 6.9% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.16 ng/mL. False positivity of nPSA + 2 was 30.2%, compared to 40.9%, 57.8%, and 71.0% for nPSA + 1.5, nPSA + 1.0, and nPSA + 0.5, respectively. Among patients with BCF, the median lead time gained from an earlier nPSA + threshold definition over the Phoenix definition was minimal. Patients with BCF had significantly lower rates of early PSA decline (mean rPSA 1.19 vs. 0.39, p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to reach nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months (83.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.0001). The proposed criterion (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months) had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.4% and 81.5%, respectively, for predicting BCF in patients meeting the Phoenix definition and decreased its false positivity to 6.4%. Conclusion: The Phoenix definition remains an excellent definition for BCF post-SBRT. Its high false positivity can be mitigated by applying additional criteria (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or time to nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85119613389
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85119613389#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 34774650
AN - SCOPUS:85119613389
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 166
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
ER -