Registry-based Trainee Assessments: Leveraging a Quality Collaborative for Surgical Education

  • Jonah D. Thomas
  • , Aldo Fafaj
  • , Samuel J. Zolin
  • , Michael J. Rosen
  • , Jeremy M. Lipman
  • , Judith C. French
  • , Ajita S. Prabhu
  • , David M. Krpata
  • , Steven Rosenblatt
  • , Charlotte M. Horne
  • , Cathleen Khandelwal
  • , Clayton C. Petro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: We present our experience developing and embedding a registry-based module for resident feedback. Methods: At our institution, entering operative data into the institutional quality collaborative registry is standard practice. In February 2019, a surgical education module was embedded into the registry to capture procedure-specific resident operative assessments. Faculty engagement with the sugical education module was assessed during its first year in existence (February 2019-February 2020). Results: In total, 1074 of 1269 (85%) operative assessments were completed by 27 faculty via the surgical education registry module. Median faculty engagement rate with the module following resident-assisted procedures was 91% [IQR 76%-100%]. Residents received a median of 7 operative assessments [IQR 2-19] over the study period. Conclusion: By embedding a surgical education module into an existing surgical quality collaborative registry, procedure-specific operative assessments can be routinely captured.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-144
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume268
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Registry-based Trainee Assessments: Leveraging a Quality Collaborative for Surgical Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this