TY - JOUR
T1 - Religion, spirituality and the well-being of informal caregivers
T2 - A review, critique, and research prospectus
AU - Hebert, Randy S.
AU - Weinstein, E.
AU - Martire, L. M.
AU - Schulz, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from the Alzheimer’s Association (NIRG-04-1065) and the National Institutes of Health (1K23MN074963-01, P50 HL65111-65112, K01 MH065547, and HL65111-65112).
PY - 2006/9/1
Y1 - 2006/9/1
N2 - The purpose of this article is to review and critique the published literature examining the relationships between religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being and to provide directions for future research. A systematic search was conducted using bibliographic databases, reference sections of articles, and by contacting experts in the field. Articles were reviewed for measurement, theoretical, and design limitations. Eighty-three studies were retrieved. Research on religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being is a burgeoning area of investigation; 37% of the articles were published in the last five years. Evidence for the effects of religion/spirituality were unclear; the preponderance (n=71, 86%) of studies found no or a mixed association (i.e., a combination of positive, negative, or non-significant results) between religion/spirituality and well-being. These ambiguous results are a reflection of the multidimensionality of religion/spirituality and the diversity of well-being outcomes examined. They also partially reflect the frequent use of unrefined measures of religion/spirituality and of atheoretical approaches to studying this topic. Investigators have a fairly large number of studies on religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being on which to build. Future studies should be theory driven and utilize psychometrically sound measures of religion/spirituality. Suggestions are provided to help guide future work.
AB - The purpose of this article is to review and critique the published literature examining the relationships between religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being and to provide directions for future research. A systematic search was conducted using bibliographic databases, reference sections of articles, and by contacting experts in the field. Articles were reviewed for measurement, theoretical, and design limitations. Eighty-three studies were retrieved. Research on religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being is a burgeoning area of investigation; 37% of the articles were published in the last five years. Evidence for the effects of religion/spirituality were unclear; the preponderance (n=71, 86%) of studies found no or a mixed association (i.e., a combination of positive, negative, or non-significant results) between religion/spirituality and well-being. These ambiguous results are a reflection of the multidimensionality of religion/spirituality and the diversity of well-being outcomes examined. They also partially reflect the frequent use of unrefined measures of religion/spirituality and of atheoretical approaches to studying this topic. Investigators have a fairly large number of studies on religion/spirituality and caregiver well-being on which to build. Future studies should be theory driven and utilize psychometrically sound measures of religion/spirituality. Suggestions are provided to help guide future work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750012579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750012579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13607860600638131
DO - 10.1080/13607860600638131
M3 - Article
C2 - 16938685
AN - SCOPUS:33750012579
SN - 1360-7863
VL - 10
SP - 497
EP - 520
JO - Aging and Mental Health
JF - Aging and Mental Health
IS - 5
ER -