TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones
AU - Vigeant, Michelle C.
AU - Giacomoni, Clothilde B.
AU - Scherma, Amy C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Dr. Robert Celmer, of the University of Hartford’s Acoustics Program, for all of his assistance with this study. In addition, the authors wish to thank Prof. David Shuman and Prof. Timothy Britt of the University of Hartford’s Audio Engineering Technology program for the use of a pair of AKG C414 B-XLS microphones, and Prof. Justin Kurtz of the University of Hartford’s Music Production Technology program for the use of a pair of Shure KSM44 and a pair of Royer R121 microphones. This work was supported by a grant from University of Hartford’s Women’s Education and Leadership Fund (WELFund). Special thanks to the program director at that time, Ms. Jennifer Sanborn.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8%) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5%, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13%) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.
AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8%) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5%, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13%) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876924157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876924157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84876924157
SN - 0003-682X
VL - 74
SP - 1076
EP - 1084
JO - Applied Acoustics
JF - Applied Acoustics
IS - 9
ER -