Abstract
The Comment by Jefferts et al. [Phys. Rev. A 91, 067601 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevA.91.067601] discusses the microwave-lensing frequency shift's possible dependence on the initial wave-packet size and two effects of wall interactions, the frequency shifts that they produce, and the nature of how dressed states are clipped by apertures. I identify conceptual errors in their criticisms, some of which are related to fundamental problems in their lensing treatment [Ashby, Phys. Rev. A 91, 033624 (2015)10.1103/PhysRevA.91.033624] for the NIST-F1 and NIST-F2 atomic clocks [K. Gibble, arXiv:1505.00691]. Aside from typesetting errors that they note, the criticisms in the Comment are shown to be incorrect.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 067602 |
| Journal | Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 18 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to ''Comment on 'Ramsey spectroscopy, matter-wave interferometry, and the microwave-lensing frequency shift' '''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver