Abstract
The discussion in Drs. Sanchez Escobedo and Hollingworth's paper independently confirms virtually all our observations regarding the psychometric and interpretive deficiencies of the Mexican norms for very high-stakes decisions, such as that involved in an Atkins hearing. Test publishers have an ethical obligation to caution potential users against the premature use of a developing assessment that does not yet meet the needed precision and evidence of validity required for very high-stakes decisions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 228-229 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Applied Neuropsychology |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jul 2009 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)