Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

Laura S. Weyrich; Bastien Llamas; Alan Cooper

doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12415

Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al. Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

Laura S. Weyrich, Bastien Llamas, Alan Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	85-86
Number of pages	2
Journal	FEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume	353
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12415
State	Published - Apr 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Microbiology
Molecular Biology
Genetics

Access to Document

10.1111/1574-6968.12415

Cite this

@article{75987b7852d644ff965475aa7cd81dc5,

title = "Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?",

author = "Weyrich, {Laura S.} and Bastien Llamas and Alan Cooper",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1111/1574-6968.12415",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "353",

pages = "85--86",

journal = "FEMS Microbiology Letters",

issn = "0378-1097",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.

T2 - Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

AU - Weyrich, Laura S.

AU - Llamas, Bastien

AU - Cooper, Alan

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898894579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898894579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1574-6968.12415

DO - 10.1111/1574-6968.12415

M3 - Article

C2 - 24617861

AN - SCOPUS:84898894579

SN - 0378-1097

VL - 353

SP - 85

EP - 86

JO - FEMS Microbiology Letters

JF - FEMS Microbiology Letters

IS - 2

ER -

Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al. Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this