Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Integrating generative AI (GenAI) in higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in maintaining academic integrity. This study explores faculty communication strategies when addressing suspected GenAI misuse, analyzing responses through Gallant’s rule-based and integrity-focused frameworks. Data from a survey reveal a dominant reliance on punitive, rule-based approaches, highlighting tensions between students and instructors. While some faculty adopt communicative and educational strategies, fostering trust and collaboration, others exhibit a dismissive stance due to perceived administrative burdens. The findings support the growing research that institutions prioritize educational interventions and support faculty in developing trust-based, proactive strategies for integrating GenAI responsibly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1544430
JournalFrontiers in Communication
Volume10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'RESEARCH-AI: Communicating academic honesty: teacher messages and student perceptions about generative AI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this