TY - GEN
T1 - Resistance or deviance? A high-tech workplace during the bursting of the dot-com bubble
AU - Tapia, Andrea Hoplight
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - Under certain circumstances a critical orientation to the study of workplace deviance/resistance is necessary to understand ICT-enabled workplace culture and employee behavior. The critical orientation to workplace deviance characterizes acts in opposition to an organization with the potential to do harm as semi-organized group resistance to organizational authority. The questions that drive this research are does technology enable deviance? When does an act of social deviance become an act of resistance against domination? The answers depend on the perspective of the labeler. To discuss these I offer the example of a case study of a small software development company called Ebiz.com. For the first few years of the existence of Ebiz.com the social control exerted on the employees increased yet there were no observable or discussed acts of employee retaliation. I argue that the social environment of the dot-com bubble allowed several myths to propagate widely and affect human behavior. As the market began to fail and dot-corns began to close the employees seemed to recognize their situation and enact deviant behavior or resist. Most importantly what I have learned from this work is that ICT work may lead to increased deviant or resistant behaviors and that ICT work may also provide a means to do increased deviant or resistant behavior.
AB - Under certain circumstances a critical orientation to the study of workplace deviance/resistance is necessary to understand ICT-enabled workplace culture and employee behavior. The critical orientation to workplace deviance characterizes acts in opposition to an organization with the potential to do harm as semi-organized group resistance to organizational authority. The questions that drive this research are does technology enable deviance? When does an act of social deviance become an act of resistance against domination? The answers depend on the perspective of the labeler. To discuss these I offer the example of a case study of a small software development company called Ebiz.com. For the first few years of the existence of Ebiz.com the social control exerted on the employees increased yet there were no observable or discussed acts of employee retaliation. I argue that the social environment of the dot-com bubble allowed several myths to propagate widely and affect human behavior. As the market began to fail and dot-corns began to close the employees seemed to recognize their situation and enact deviant behavior or resist. Most importantly what I have learned from this work is that ICT work may lead to increased deviant or resistant behaviors and that ICT work may also provide a means to do increased deviant or resistant behavior.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882039613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882039613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84882039613
SN - 1402080948
SN - 9781402080944
T3 - IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
SP - 577
EP - 596
BT - Inf. Systems Research
PB - Springer New York LLC
T2 - IFIP TC8/WG8.2 20th Year Retrospective: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice-Looking Forward from a 20-Year Perspective on IS Research
Y2 - 15 July 2004 through 17 July 2004
ER -