Abstract
We examine the effect of the introduction of uniform water charging for aquifer management and provide evidence using a survey-based choice experiment of agricultural water users in rural Tunisia. Theoretically, we show that the implementation of the proposed second-best regulation would result both in efficiency gains and in distributional effects in favor of small landholders. Empirically, we find that resistance to the introduction of an effective water-charging regime is greatest among the largest landholders. Resistance to the regulation of common resources may be rooted in the manner in which heterogeneity might determine the distributional impact of different management regimes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 435-459 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Land Economics |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resistance to the regulation of common water resources in rural Tunisia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver