Abstract
Hawks et al. argue that our analysis of Australopithecus sediba mandibles is flawed and that specimen LD 350-1 cannot be distinguished from this, or any other, Australopithecus species. Our reexamination of the evidence confirms that LD 350-1 falls outside of the pattern that A. sediba shares with Australopithecus and thus is reasonably assigned to the genus Homo.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1326c |
| Journal | Science |
| Volume | 348 |
| Issue number | 6241 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Jun 19 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comment on "Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver