Retention of riveted aluminum leg bands by wild Turkeys

Duane R. Diefenbach, Wendy C. Vreeland, Mary Jo Casalena, Michael V. Schiavone

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


In order for mark–recapture models to provide unbiased estimates of population parameters, it is critical that uniquely identifying tags or marks are not lost. We double-banded male and female wild turkeys with aluminum rivet bands and estimated the probability that a bird would be recovered with both bands < 1–225 wk since banding (mean = 51.2 wk, SD = 44.0). We found that 100% of females (n = 37) were recovered with both bands. For males, we recovered 6 of 188 turkeys missing a rivet band for a retention probability of 0.984 (95% CI = 0.96–0.99). If male turkeys are doublebanded with rivet bands the probability of recovering a turkey without any marks is < 0.001. We failed to detect a change in band retention over time or differences between adults and juveniles. Given the low cost and high retention rates of rivet aluminum bands, we believe they are an effective marking technique for wild turkeys and, for most studies, will minimize any concern about the assumption that marks are not lost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere1944-687X
Pages (from-to)162-164
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jun 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation


Dive into the research topics of 'Retention of riveted aluminum leg bands by wild Turkeys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this