Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: current status

Harshit Garg, Siddharth Yadav, Prabhjot Singh, Ashok Hemal, Rajeev Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The classic retroperitoneal open surgical access to the kidney has been duplicated while performing laparoscopy but is less common than transperitoneal laparoscopy. We reviewed minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy as a part of the international consultation on urological diseases and European Association of Urology international consultation on minimally invasive surgery in urology. A Pubmed/Medline search was performed to identify studies assessing the feasibility, safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. The articles were reviewed to assess outcomes after simple, radical and donor nephrectomy and comparative trials between retroperitoneoscopic versus the open and transperitoneal route were evaluated. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is feasible for most cases of benign non-functioning kidneys. Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy is also feasible for most tumours and may be better suited for posteriorly located tumours. Both retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal nephrectomy have similar outcomes but the operative time may be shorter for the former. The data are insufficient for robotic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy probably because of limited space and lack of benefit of a robot in ablative surgeries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-513
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Urology
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Urology

Cite this