TY - JOUR
T1 - Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces
T2 - Toward biologically inspired paradigms
AU - Rothrock, Ling
AU - Koubek, Richard
AU - Fuchs, Frederic
AU - Haas, Michael
AU - Salvendy, Gavriel
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - The field of Adaptive Interfaces has been an active area of research for over 10 years. While there have been great advances, unresolved issues remain. The paper presents a reappraisal of adaptive interfaces with an eye toward addressing these issues using biologically inspired methods. We first define a general and theoretical model of adaptive interfaces based on a survey of existing research. Using our generalized adaptive interface model, we then proceed to build taxonomies of variables used for adaptation. The aim is to provide researchers, designers and builders a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, processes and outcomes of adaptive interfaces. From our review, we propose design rules that address three primary elements of a generalized adaptive interface: the identification of variables that call for adaptation, the determination of necessary modifications to the interface, and the selection of the decision inference mechanism. We then turn to the investigation of an alternative method for adaptive interface design. To find a method that corresponds better to human decision-making, which has been characterized as situated and recognition-primed, we explored biologically inspired techniques. In particular, we focus on the correspondence between human decision-making behaviour and the concepts of emergence and self-organization. While our ruminations are speculative, the future of biologically inspired interfaces seems promising.
AB - The field of Adaptive Interfaces has been an active area of research for over 10 years. While there have been great advances, unresolved issues remain. The paper presents a reappraisal of adaptive interfaces with an eye toward addressing these issues using biologically inspired methods. We first define a general and theoretical model of adaptive interfaces based on a survey of existing research. Using our generalized adaptive interface model, we then proceed to build taxonomies of variables used for adaptation. The aim is to provide researchers, designers and builders a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms, processes and outcomes of adaptive interfaces. From our review, we propose design rules that address three primary elements of a generalized adaptive interface: the identification of variables that call for adaptation, the determination of necessary modifications to the interface, and the selection of the decision inference mechanism. We then turn to the investigation of an alternative method for adaptive interface design. To find a method that corresponds better to human decision-making, which has been characterized as situated and recognition-primed, we explored biologically inspired techniques. In particular, we focus on the correspondence between human decision-making behaviour and the concepts of emergence and self-organization. While our ruminations are speculative, the future of biologically inspired interfaces seems promising.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011248410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011248410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14639220110110342
DO - 10.1080/14639220110110342
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011248410
SN - 1463-922X
VL - 3
SP - 47
EP - 84
JO - Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
JF - Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
IS - 1
ER -