TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of gaps, obstacles, and technological challenges in hypersonic applications (Gotchas)
AU - Barber, Timothy A.
AU - Majdalani, Joseph
AU - Maicke, Brian A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Engineering Development Complex, and from Dr. David L. Buckwalter, Program Manager, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, through Contract No. FA 9101-06-D-0001/0003.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by Begell House, Inc.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - In this study, the extensive hypersonic literature is canvassed for the purpose of identifying and compiling a list of gaps, obstacles, and technological challenges in hypersonic applications (GOTCHAs). The significance of GOTCHA-related deficiencies is discussed along with potential solutions, promising methodologies, and feasible remedies that may be considered by engineers in pursuit of next-generation hypersonic vehicle designs and optimizations. Based on the synthesis of several modern surveys and public reports, a cohesive list is formed consisting of widely accepted areas needing improvement under several general categories. These include: aerodynamics, propulsion, materials, analytical modeling, computational fluid dynamics modeling, and education in high-speed flow physics. New methods and lines of research inquiry are suggested such as homotopy-based analysis for the treatment of strong nonlinearities, the use of improved turbulence models and unstructured grids in numerical simulations, the need for accessible validation data, and the refinement of mission objectives for hypersonic airbreathing propulsion.
AB - In this study, the extensive hypersonic literature is canvassed for the purpose of identifying and compiling a list of gaps, obstacles, and technological challenges in hypersonic applications (GOTCHAs). The significance of GOTCHA-related deficiencies is discussed along with potential solutions, promising methodologies, and feasible remedies that may be considered by engineers in pursuit of next-generation hypersonic vehicle designs and optimizations. Based on the synthesis of several modern surveys and public reports, a cohesive list is formed consisting of widely accepted areas needing improvement under several general categories. These include: aerodynamics, propulsion, materials, analytical modeling, computational fluid dynamics modeling, and education in high-speed flow physics. New methods and lines of research inquiry are suggested such as homotopy-based analysis for the treatment of strong nonlinearities, the use of improved turbulence models and unstructured grids in numerical simulations, the need for accessible validation data, and the refinement of mission objectives for hypersonic airbreathing propulsion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065062284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065062284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2018022006
DO - 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2018022006
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85065062284
SN - 2150-766X
VL - 17
SP - 13
EP - 55
JO - International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion
JF - International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion
IS - 1
ER -