TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting criteria for plant microRNA annotation in the Era of big data
AU - Axtell, Michael J.
AU - Meyers, Blake C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Margaret Frank, Patricia Baldrich, and Matthew Endres for critical comments on this manuscript. We thank Seth Polydore for aligned sRNA-seq data. The U.S. National Science Foundation supports research in both authors’ labs (M.J.A.’s lab by award 1339207 and B.C.M.’s lab by awards 1257869 and 1339229).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ASPB.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are ~21-nucleotide-long regulatory RNAs that arise from endonucleolytic processing of hairpin precursors. Many function as essential posttranscriptional regulators of target mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Alongside miRNAs, plants also produce large numbers of short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which are distinguished from miRNAs primarily by their biogenesis (typically processed from long double-stranded RNA instead of single-stranded hairpins) and functions (typically via roles in transcriptional regulation instead of posttranscriptional regulation). Next-generation DNA sequencing methods have yielded extensive data sets of plant small RNAs, resulting in many miRNA annotations. However, it has become clear that many miRNA annotations are questionable. The sheer number of endogenous siRNAs compared with miRNAs has been a major factor in the erroneous annotation of siRNAs as miRNAs. Here, we provide updated criteria for the confident annotation of plant miRNAs, suitable for the era of “big data” from DNA sequencing. The updated criteria emphasize replication and the minimization of false positives, and they require next-generation sequencing of small RNAs. We argue that improved annotation systems are needed for miRNAs and all other classes of plant small RNAs. Finally, to illustrate the complexities of miRNA and siRNA annotation, we review the evolution and functions of miRNAs and siRNAs in plants.
AB - MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are ~21-nucleotide-long regulatory RNAs that arise from endonucleolytic processing of hairpin precursors. Many function as essential posttranscriptional regulators of target mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Alongside miRNAs, plants also produce large numbers of short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which are distinguished from miRNAs primarily by their biogenesis (typically processed from long double-stranded RNA instead of single-stranded hairpins) and functions (typically via roles in transcriptional regulation instead of posttranscriptional regulation). Next-generation DNA sequencing methods have yielded extensive data sets of plant small RNAs, resulting in many miRNA annotations. However, it has become clear that many miRNA annotations are questionable. The sheer number of endogenous siRNAs compared with miRNAs has been a major factor in the erroneous annotation of siRNAs as miRNAs. Here, we provide updated criteria for the confident annotation of plant miRNAs, suitable for the era of “big data” from DNA sequencing. The updated criteria emphasize replication and the minimization of false positives, and they require next-generation sequencing of small RNAs. We argue that improved annotation systems are needed for miRNAs and all other classes of plant small RNAs. Finally, to illustrate the complexities of miRNA and siRNA annotation, we review the evolution and functions of miRNAs and siRNAs in plants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043782214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043782214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1105/tpc.17.00851
DO - 10.1105/tpc.17.00851
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 29343505
AN - SCOPUS:85043782214
SN - 1040-4651
VL - 30
SP - 272
EP - 284
JO - Plant Cell
JF - Plant Cell
IS - 2
ER -